The Individual Experience in a World of Categories :: Sociology Sociological Essays

The Individual Experience in a World of Categories Lakoff and Johnson contend for an exemplified mind, saying that our classes depend on how we experience the world through our bodies. As indicated by this hypothesis, because of their various life systems, people would encounter the world diversely and their classifications would be inalienably extraordinary. Likewise, it would be normal that all ladies would have similar classifications. Our class and our conversations have exhibited an assorted variety of assessments and strategies for order that discredit this piece of Lakoff and Johnson's contention. I imagine that Lakoff and Johnson were right in saying that the classes we structure are a piece of our experience (Lakoff and Johnson 19). Be that as it may, what they fail to factor into their examination of the manner in which people arrange is the distinctions of every individual experience. Classes and their implications depend on a person's very own insight into the world, and that is the reason no classification implies the very same thing for more than one person. I need to inspect the classifications of race and sexuality in Moraga and Delany to show the essentialness of the individual experience and its immediate association with classifications. Likewise, I need to propose that race as other is more tricky than sexuality to one's very own personality. Delany's Revultion/Perversion/Diversion presents us with a progression of disturbing stories. They all start inside Delany's life, however his explanation behind picking these specific stories is correctly in light of the fact that they are strange (Delany 125). Indeed, even inside one's own individual experience, there is a uniqueness to occasions. The classification gay doesn't imply that the people who recognize themselves as a major aspect of it will share a comprehension of all that it has intended for one individual to guarantee this mark for himself/herself. Delany recognizes that the distinguishing proof with others that classes make is in a manner bogus, even the likenesses are at long last, to the degree they are living ones, a play of contrasts (Delany 131). He underscores that a significant part of the sexual experience stays outside of language. No everything will be shared, not all things can be. A person's excursion to asserting his/her own character is dug in the indi vidual excursion, in events both trademark and strange. In any case, perhaps these unique stories are not as strange to his experience as Delany accepts. It is actuality that they are surely a piece of Delany's understanding as a gay man, and he says himself that there is no all inclusive gay experience.